Case review
An investigator reads what happened and tells you, plainly, whether a bank complaint is worth making.
No win, no fee
We build the complaint. You pay nothing unless money comes back.
Check eligibilityAn investigator reads what happened and tells you, plainly, whether a bank complaint is worth making.
We write a complaint the firm has to answer: timeline, evidence, and the duty we say was missed.
If the bank refuses, or eight weeks pass, we can put the same file to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Different stories, the same question: should the bank have stopped the payment, or refunded it afterwards?
A platform, broker, or adviser that was never real.
Learn moreA relationship used to move you towards a payment.
Learn morePaid online tasks that ask you to deposit to withdraw.
Learn moreA fake exchange, wallet, or recovery broker.
Learn moreA caller who tells you to move money to protect it.
Learn moreA changed bank account on a bill you meant to pay.
Learn morePayments you did not make and did not approve.
Learn moreSomeone posing as a bank, HMRC, the police, or a lawyer.
Learn moreGoods, tickets, or a vehicle that never arrived.
Learn moreThe payment trail, the warnings, and the rules the firm had to follow.
Explore all specialisms
The people on a case sit in three groups. You will know who is doing what.
Open a group to see the work it owns. Photographs are of the people named on the team page.
3% of the first $100,000 CAD recovered, 2% of the portion up to $500,000, and 1% above $500,000. Nothing upfront.
★★★★★
The bank had refused the trading transfers. After the complaint, the funds were paid back into my account.
★★★★★
RBC’s first answer was no. The funds were paid back after the written complaint.
★★★★★
There is no branch, so the chat was the record. Tangerine paid the funds back from that file.